GST: Industry sees no relief on compliance

goods and services tax

With the central government keeping many regressive provisions in the final draft of the goods and services (GST) law to get reluctant states on board, the ambitious tax reform may not ease the compliance burden or improve the ease of doing business as significantly as earlier thought.

Revision of GST orders for three years, permitting officials to check vehicles in transit, levy of up to 2% tax collected at source on e-commerce marketplaces and the requirement of service providers to register in every state are some of the provisions in the draft law included at the insistence of states despite severe opposition from industry, said two officials familiar with the draft.

Read All About GST from Beginning

GST aims to remove barriers and ensure seamless movement of goods and services across the across states, thereby improving the ease of doing business.

But there are many provisions in the draft GST law approved by the GST council, which industry fears will increase the compliance burden and bring in inspector raj.

The GST law retains provisions present in the value added tax (VAT) laws wherein the taxmen can revise orders for three years. These powers will mean cases drag on for a long time.

It also retains provisions that will allow tax authorities to check vehicles in transit, a move that brings back fears of inspector raj. Though transporters will now be issued one single e-permit electronically by the goods and services tax network, the clause that such permits can be checked at the toll posts has industry worried.

It also retains the provision that requires an e-commerce company to collect up to 2% tax (1% Central GST+1% State GST or 2% integrated GST) on the total payment made to a supplier for the goods supplied, and deposit it with the government on behalf of the supplier. This has been opposed by the e-commerce companies who have argued that this will increase compliance costs.

Service providers will also have to register in every state they operate, thereby requiring them to file multiple returns every year.


Live Mint, 15 March 2017

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *