Authorities cannot reject the application of GST registration on the ground of Non- Submission of Electricity Bill by the Applicant where house tax receipts are already provided

Case Details:

Issue- In the above case, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by respondent authority rejecting the application of petitioner for GST Registration. the petitioner applied for grant of registration under the Act through online mode. On submission of the application, an inspection was made at the business premises of the petitioner on 15-9-2021 and thereafter, notice was issued for providing certain information and documents in support thereof. On submission of reply, by means of the impugned order dated 23-9-2021, the application of the petitioner was rejected, against which the petitioner preferred an appeal before the respondent no. 3, which too has been dismissed vide order dated 28-10-2021.

Held- It was held that on perusal of the show cause notice, rejection order and the appellate order, it appears that firstly clarification with regard to the possession of business premisses was required to be specified and secondly submission of electricity bill/house tax receipt was required. The petitioner has submitted the explanation with regard to the nature or possession of the business premisses as the owner and also submitted the house tax receipt in compliance with the show cause notice. But the authorities below without whispering any word or assigning any reason had rejected the application for non-specifying possession of the business premisses and insisted for submission of electricity bill. The authorities below have further erred in law in not pointing out any defect in submission of house tax receipt and insisted for submission of electricity bill whereas the notice dated 15-9-2021 gave an option for submission of recent electricity bill or house tax receipt. Further the petitioner has explained that the property, in which the business is being undertaken, is under the ownership of the petitioner. So the other grounds also falls for non specifying the nature or possession of the property. Further in the grounds of appeal, it has specifically been mentioned that the petitioner’s place of business is under ownership of the sole proprietor. Once the fact which has not only been mentioned in the in the reply to the show cause notice given in the application filed for grant of registration but also in the grounds of appeal, it was bounded duty of the authorities to look into the same and then pass the order in accordance with law instead of their own whims and fancies. Once the petitioner has satisfied the requirement of the law for providing PAN, Aadhar and also house tax receipt/property receipt then the authority should not have insisted for submission of receipt of electricity bill. In the absence of any short comings or defect being pointed out in the reply submitted along with documents, the petitioner has every right to carry on her business lawfully and her right to do business cannot be confiscated in illegal and arbitrary manner. Before parting with the judgement, the Court is constraint to observe that the two authorities of the State have acted only with a view to harass the petitioner which cannot be accepted at any cost. This attitude of the respondents in this petition cannot be tolerated as the officers are being State functionary has to act fairly and their action must be in consonance with the provisions of the Acts as well as Rules, the impugned orders dated 23-9-2021 and 28-10-2021 cannot be sustained in the eyes of law. The impugned orders dated 23-9-2021 and 28-10-2021 are hereby quashed. The respondents are directed to pass an appropriate order on the material available on record within a period of seven working days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is allowed with cost of Rs. 15,000/-, which shall be deposited before the High Court State Legal Services Committee, Allahabad within a period of 20 days from today.