GSTN's advisory dated 16 October 2026 introduces the RCMDOM and RCMIMP supply types for e-invoicing of recipient-generated self-invoices under reverse charge. The facility, meant for taxpayers with AATO of ₹5 crore and above, is presently available only in the IRP sandboxes.
1. Taxability & Valuation Clarifications
The Council decided that standalone restaurants cannot declare themselves as “specified premises.” Accordingly, they cannot opt to pay GST...
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Ashwani Agarwal
v.
Union Of India
Samit Gopal AND Ramesh Sinha, JJ.
WRIT TAX No. 451 of 2020
SEPTEMBER 7, 2020
ORDER
Heard Sri Rahul Agarwal,...
Case Title: Abdul Saleem v. Assistant Commissioner, Anti-EvasionCourt: High Court of Kerala at ErnakulamPetition No.: WP(C) 1711 of 2025Date of Judgment: 16 January 2025Category...
In Assistant Commissioner of Central GST, Ankleshwar v. Shreeji Enterprise, GSTAT Surat held that assignment of GIDC leasehold rights to a third party is not liable to GST and dismissed the Department's appeals, holding that the Gujarat High Court's ruling binds the Tribunal despite a proposed review.
In M/s Groma Infrastructure Ltd. v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Karnataka, the GSTAT Bengaluru Bench set aside the dismissal of a first appeal without hearing, holding that an “even assuming” interest computation is not an admission under Section 107(6). On merits, it upheld Section 50 interest on differential tax paid late through DRC-03 but reduced the GSTR-3B interest after crediting interest already paid.
In M/s Navitas Eduservices Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of CGST, South Delhi, the GSTAT Principal Bench held that cost-plus marketing and IT support services supplied to the Australian parent are export of services, not intermediary services, and directed refund with interest. It also held that the First Appellate Authority cannot remand a matter under the guise of annulment.
In Shaurya Alloys Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Punjab, the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act but held that ITC cannot be denied mechanically for a supplier's default or retrospective cancellation, and laid down guidelines for proper officers.
In Rohit Garg v. Union of India (W.P.(C) 8829/2026 and connected matters), the Delhi High Court relegated challenges to Section 122 penalty orders to the Section 107 appeal, holding the proper-officer objection not a patent lack of jurisdiction and applying the pre-amendment pre-deposit to SCNs issued before 01.10.2025.
A practical guide to e-invoicing of reverse charge self-invoices under the new RCMDOM and RCMIMP supply types announced by GSTN on 16 October 2026. It covers the supplies and recipients covered, the step-by-step process, and key issues on time of supply, place of supply, tax head, valuation and input tax credit.
Legislative trigger and compliance architecture under section 14A
The Mauritian Guide for Foreign Suppliers of Digital and Electronic Services is framed as an administrative...
Introduction
The GST adjudication framework aims to balance effective revenue protection with procedural economy. In practice, however, taxpayers sometimes face a cluster of Show Cause...
Recent Comments