Case Details:
Particular | Details |
Case No. | W.P.(C) NO. 14887 of 2021 |
Case Name | Shree Udyog v. Commissioner of State Tax Odisha,Cuttack |
Court | Orissa High Court |
Date of Judgement | 10-06-2021 |
Citation | GIG-CLS-0084 |
Â
Issue- In the above case, the petitioner has challenged the appeal rejection order passed by respondent authority rejecting appeal of the petitioner stating that the appeal was not presented within the time prescribed under law. Under Rule 108 (3) of the OGST Rules, 2017, the appeal had to be accompanied by a certified copy of the order appealed against. This had to be submitted within seven days of the filing of the appeal. Under the proviso to rule 108(3) if the certified copy is submitted within seven days of the filing of the appeal, then the date of filing of the appeal would be the date of the issue of the provisional acknowledgment. If it is filed after seven days, the date of filing of the appeal would be the date of submission of such certified copy but petitioner filed the appeal electronically accompanied a downloaded copy of the order. Respondent authority stated that Petitioner could furnish a certified copy of the order of appealed against only on 9th March, 2021, i.e., more than three months and 25 days after the filing of the appeal. According to the Appellate Authority, i.e., the Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Balasore, this delay could not be condoned and, therefore, the appeal itself was dismissed as not having been preferred in time.
Held- It was held that the explanation offered by the petitioner is a plausible and not an unreasonable one, especially in these Covid times, and further considering that a downloaded copy thereof was in fact submitted along with the appeal which was otherwise filed within time, this Court is of the view that the mere delay in enclosing a certified copy of order appealed against along with the appeal should not come in the way of the Petitioner’s appeal for being considered on merits by the Appellate Authority. This is a case of substantial compliance, and the interests of justice ought not to be constrained by a hyper technical view of the requirement that a certified copy of the order appealed against should be submitted within one week of the filing of the appeal. To repeat, in these Covid times when there is a restricted functioning of Courts and Tribunals in general, a more liberal approach is warranted in matters of condonation of delay, which cannot be said to be extraordinary. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 10th March, 2021 of the Appellate Authority rejecting the appeal on the ground of delay, is hereby set aside. The appeal is now restored to the file of the Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Balasore. The Appellate Authority will proceed to decide the appeal on merits and endeavour to dispose it of by a reasoned order in accordance with law.