Thursday, July 9, 2026
HomeCase LawsGST registration suspension upheld as Rule 22(3) timeline held directory, not mandatory,...
Case LawsHigh Court

GST registration suspension upheld as Rule 22(3) timeline held directory, not mandatory, permitting adjudication beyond 30 days

Kirti Gupta
By Kirti Gupta
0
129
🔒

Login to Read Full Content

You are reading a preview. Log in to continue reading.

Log In to Read

New here? Register free

RELATED ARTICLES

Leave a Reply

Most Popular

Load more

Recent Comments

KALYANI ELECTRICALS on Penalty under GST quashed as High Court held that presentation of valid invoice rules out applicability of Section 129(1)(b) meant for non-owners
Spardha Sharma on Circulars clarifying miscellaneous issues related to SEZ and refund of unutilized ITC for job workers.

EDITOR PICKS

POPULAR POSTS

POPULAR CATEGORY

ABOUT US

Our site provides comprehensive GST resources, including expert Q&A, latest case laws, in-depth articles, updated notifications, statutory rules, legal provisions, and tariff schedules. Designed for professionals, businesses, and learners, we aim to simplify GST compliance and enhance legal understanding with accurate, up-to-date, and practical insights on GST matters.

Contact us: info@gstindiaguide.com

FOLLOW US

© GSTINDIAGUIDE

Discover more from GST Indiaguide

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading