HomeCase LawsBombay HC: Proceedings Under Omitted Rule 96(10) Unsustainable — Refund Demands Quashed Case LawsHigh Court Bombay HC: Proceedings Under Omitted Rule 96(10) Unsustainable — Refund Demands Quashed By Team Gstindiaguide 9th January 2026 0 349 Share FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsApp 🔒 Login to Read Full Content You are reading a preview. Log in to continue reading. Log In to Read New here? Register free RELATED ARTICLES Case Laws Provisional Attachment Cannot Be Renewed After Lapse: SC Clarifies Limits of Section 83 9th January 2026 Case Laws Supreme Court Clarifies: GST Summons Are Not ‘Proceedings’ — Parallel Investigation Permitted 9th January 2026 Case Laws Supreme Court: Bona Fide Purchasers Cannot Be Denied ITC Due to Seller’s Tax Default under Delhi VAT 9th January 2026 Leave a ReplyCancel reply Most Popular GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Scrutiny Procedure till 31 December 2026 1st July 2026 GSTN Advisory on Revision of Timeline for Amendment of Aggregate Annual Turnover for FY 2025-26 1st July 2026 Government Extends Last Date for Filing GSTAT Appeals to 31 July 2026 Amid Heavy Portal Rush 30th June 2026 GSTAT Ranchi Bench Prescribes Dress Code for Authorised Representatives Appearing Before the Tribunal 29th June 2026 Load more Recent Comments KALYANI ELECTRICALS on Penalty under GST quashed as High Court held that presentation of valid invoice rules out applicability of Section 129(1)(b) meant for non-owners Spardha Sharma on Circulars clarifying miscellaneous issues related to SEZ and refund of unutilized ITC for job workers.