Case Name: Sanjib Kumar Baishakh @ Baishaka v. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Bhubaneswar & Another
Court Name: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack
Petition Number: WP(C) No. 25593 of 2024
Category of Dispute: GST Registration Cancellation and Revocation
Date of Judgement: 28.11.2024
Relevant Section: Rule 23 of the OGST Rules, 2017
CGST/OGST Provisions Involved: Rule 23, OGST Rules, 2017
Facts of the Case [¶1]:
-
The petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled via show cause notice dated 28.12.2020 and final order dated 19.01.2021.
-
The petitioner sought restoration of the registration and was willing to pay all statutory dues including tax, interest, late fee, penalty, etc.
-
The petitioner relied on the decision in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha (W.P.(C) No. 30374 of 2022), where delay in filing revocation was condoned.
Question(s) in Consideration [¶1, ¶3]:
-
Whether the delay in invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the OGST Rules for revocation of GST registration can be condoned?
-
Whether restoration of registration can be permitted subject to payment of all statutory dues?
Observation of the Court [¶3]:
-
The Court took note of the precedent in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises, particularly paragraph 2 of that order, where delay in filing revocation under Rule 23 was condoned in interest of revenue.
-
The Court held that the same reasoning applies in the present case.
Judgement of the Court [¶3–4]:
-
The Court condoned the delay in filing the application for revocation under Rule 23 of the OGST Rules.
-
The petitioner was directed to deposit all due amounts and comply with statutory formalities.
-
The application for revocation was to be considered on merits in accordance with law.
-
The writ petition was accordingly disposed of.
🧾 Between Fine Lines:
-
GST registration can be restored even after delay, if revenue dues are paid.
-
Delay in applying for revocation can be condoned by High Court in suitable cases.
-
Willingness to pay all statutory dues plays a crucial role in getting relief.
-
Relief is granted in line with precedent to protect revenue interest.
-
The application for revocation must still meet legal requirements post-payment.
🧷 Summary of Referred Cases:
| Name of Case | Citation | Summary | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha | WP(C) No. 30374 of 2022, Orissa HC | Delay in filing revocation application was condoned in interest of revenue | Delay condoned; application to be considered as per law |
Disclaimer – “The above summary is for academic purpose only; not formal legal opinion. Seek professional opinion before application. Author or publisher or website shall not be responsible for any usage in any form.”

