Home Case Laws GST on Mango Pulp Clarified: Taxable at 12% from 01.07.2017

GST on Mango Pulp Clarified: Taxable at 12% from 01.07.2017

0
306

Case Title: Harshad Mango Products Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Court: High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad
Petition No.: R/Special Civil Application No. 21124 of 2023 with R/SCA No. 177 of 2024
Judgment Date: 23.04.2025
Category of Dispute: Classification & Rate of GST
Relevant Sections: Sections 9, 11, 74, 168 of CGST Act, 2017; Notifications 1/2017-CT(R), 2/2017-CT(R); Circular 179/11/2022-GST
Neutral Citation: 2025:GUJHC:27349-DB


Facts of the Case (Ref. Para 4.1 – 4.13)

  • The petitioner company processed mangoes into pulp for domestic and export sales.

  • GST Notifications 1/2017-CT(R) and 2/2017-CT(R) classified mangoes as fresh (exempt) and dried (taxable).

  • Entry 30A (inserted in 2017) taxed “mangoes, sliced and dried” at 5%. The petitioner classified mango pulp under this entry and paid 5% GST.

  • In July 2022, GST Council clarified that “mangoes other than sliced and dried” (including pulp) attract 12% GST.

  • CBIC Circular 179/11/2022 (03.08.2022) reinforced this.

  • Petitioner challenged this circular, claiming retrospective imposition of higher tax was ultra vires and unconstitutional.


Questions in Consideration (Ref. Para 5 & 6)

  1. Whether mango pulp falls under “mango sliced, dried” (5% GST) or under a separate category taxable at 12%.

  2. Whether CBIC Circular 179/11/2022 can retrospectively impose 12% GST on mango pulp from 01.07.2017.

  3. Whether retrospective classification violates Articles 14 & 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.


Observations of the Court (Ref. Para 9.1 – 9.5)

  • Relied heavily on Vimal Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (SCA No. 21700/2022, decided 24.04.2024).

  • Held that GST Council’s clarification in its 47th Meeting (June 2022) applied retrospectively, confirming mango pulp was always intended to be taxed at 12% (Para 43).

  • Entry 30A applied only to “mango sliced, dried” – not pulp (Para 45).

  • Notification 6/2022 was clarificatory, not a new levy (Para 43–45).

  • Show cause notices based on 18% classification were invalid (Para 46).


Judgment of the Court (Ref. Para 10)

  • The petitions were partly allowed.

  • Mango pulp is liable to GST at 12% from 01.07.2017 onwards, not at 5% (claimed by petitioner) or 18% (claimed by department).

  • Impugned SCNs were quashed to the extent they demanded 18%.

  • No costs were awarded.


Between Fine Lines

  1. Mango pulp does not qualify as “sliced and dried” mango.

  2. GST Council clarified pulp is taxable at 12% from the beginning of GST regime.

  3. Circular 179/2022 is clarificatory, not retrospective imposition.

  4. Department cannot demand 18% under residuary entry.

  5. Petitioners must pay 12% GST on mango pulp from 01.07.2017.


Summary of Referred Cases

Case Name Citation Summary Verdict
Vimal Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India SCA No. 21700 of 2022, Gujarat HC, 24.04.2024 Issue was classification of mango pulp under HSN 0804. Court held mango pulp falls under “other than sliced, dried mangoes” taxable at 12% retrospectively. Petition partly allowed, GST @ 12% confirmed from 01.07.2017; SCN demanding 18% quashed.

 

Disclaimer – “The above summary is for academic purpose only; not formal legal opinion. Seek professional opinion before application. Author or publisher or website shall not be responsible for any usage in any form.”

LEAVE A REPLY