Case Title: Harshad Mango Products Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Court: High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad
Petition No.: R/Special Civil Application No. 21124 of 2023 with R/SCA No. 177 of 2024
Judgment Date: 23.04.2025
Category of Dispute: Classification & Rate of GST
Relevant Sections: Sections 9, 11, 74, 168 of CGST Act, 2017; Notifications 1/2017-CT(R), 2/2017-CT(R); Circular 179/11/2022-GST
Neutral Citation: 2025:GUJHC:27349-DB
Facts of the Case (Ref. Para 4.1 – 4.13)
-
The petitioner company processed mangoes into pulp for domestic and export sales.
-
GST Notifications 1/2017-CT(R) and 2/2017-CT(R) classified mangoes as fresh (exempt) and dried (taxable).
-
Entry 30A (inserted in 2017) taxed “mangoes, sliced and dried” at 5%. The petitioner classified mango pulp under this entry and paid 5% GST.
-
In July 2022, GST Council clarified that “mangoes other than sliced and dried” (including pulp) attract 12% GST.
-
CBIC Circular 179/11/2022 (03.08.2022) reinforced this.
-
Petitioner challenged this circular, claiming retrospective imposition of higher tax was ultra vires and unconstitutional.
Questions in Consideration (Ref. Para 5 & 6)
-
Whether mango pulp falls under “mango sliced, dried” (5% GST) or under a separate category taxable at 12%.
-
Whether CBIC Circular 179/11/2022 can retrospectively impose 12% GST on mango pulp from 01.07.2017.
-
Whether retrospective classification violates Articles 14 & 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
Observations of the Court (Ref. Para 9.1 – 9.5)
-
Relied heavily on Vimal Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (SCA No. 21700/2022, decided 24.04.2024).
-
Held that GST Council’s clarification in its 47th Meeting (June 2022) applied retrospectively, confirming mango pulp was always intended to be taxed at 12% (Para 43).
-
Entry 30A applied only to “mango sliced, dried” – not pulp (Para 45).
-
Notification 6/2022 was clarificatory, not a new levy (Para 43–45).
-
Show cause notices based on 18% classification were invalid (Para 46).
Judgment of the Court (Ref. Para 10)
-
The petitions were partly allowed.
-
Mango pulp is liable to GST at 12% from 01.07.2017 onwards, not at 5% (claimed by petitioner) or 18% (claimed by department).
-
Impugned SCNs were quashed to the extent they demanded 18%.
-
No costs were awarded.
Between Fine Lines
-
Mango pulp does not qualify as “sliced and dried” mango.
-
GST Council clarified pulp is taxable at 12% from the beginning of GST regime.
-
Circular 179/2022 is clarificatory, not retrospective imposition.
-
Department cannot demand 18% under residuary entry.
-
Petitioners must pay 12% GST on mango pulp from 01.07.2017.
Summary of Referred Cases
| Case Name | Citation | Summary | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vimal Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India | SCA No. 21700 of 2022, Gujarat HC, 24.04.2024 | Issue was classification of mango pulp under HSN 0804. Court held mango pulp falls under “other than sliced, dried mangoes” taxable at 12% retrospectively. | Petition partly allowed, GST @ 12% confirmed from 01.07.2017; SCN demanding 18% quashed. |
Disclaimer – “The above summary is for academic purpose only; not formal legal opinion. Seek professional opinion before application. Author or publisher or website shall not be responsible for any usage in any form.”




