Case Title: Kirtidan Samarthdan Gadhavi vs. State of Gujarat & Anr.
Court: High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad
Petition Number: R/Special Civil Application No. 2362 of 2025
Date of Judgment: 23.04.2025
Category of Dispute: GST Registration Cancellation
Relevant Sections: Section 29(2)(c) of CGST Act, 2017; Rule 22(1) of CGST Rules, 2017
Neutral Citation: 2025:GUJHC:25370-DB
Facts of the Case (Para 3.1 – 3.6)
-
The petitioner, proprietor of M/s. Kirtidan Gadhavi, engaged in performing arts, obtained GST registration on 26.10.2017.
-
On 09.11.2022, a system-generated SCN under Section 29(2)(c) for cancellation of registration was issued for non-filing of returns for six months; registration was suspended immediately without hearing.
-
Petitioner was unaware of the notice as his CA, who handled GST compliance, had left India without informing him. Consequently, an ex-parte cancellation order was passed on 16.02.2023 w.e.f. 31.03.2022.
-
Petitioner later cleared all dues: ₹32,12,410 GST, ₹5,28,902 interest, and ₹2,96,000 late fees. He sought restoration citing absence of reasons in SCN and placed reliance on Aggrawal Dyeing and Printing Works v. State of Gujarat (2022).
Questions in Consideration (Para 4 & 5)
-
Whether cancellation of GST registration without proper reasoning and hearing was valid under Section 29(2)(c).
-
Whether compliance by paying all dues with interest and fees can justify restoration of registration.
-
Whether repeated defaults by the petitioner disentitled him from relief.
Observations of the Court (Para 6)
-
Petitioner indeed failed in compliance, warranting cancellation under Section 29(2)(c).
-
However, since all dues were cleared with interest and penalty, and petitioner showed willingness to file an undertaking for future compliance, restoration deserved consideration.
-
Authorities are directed to ignore past defaults once revocation application is filed and decide afresh in law.
Judgment of the Court (Para 7 – 9)
-
Petition allowed.
-
SCN dated 09.11.2022 and cancellation order dated 16.02.2023 quashed.
-
Petitioner to file revocation application within four weeks. Authorities to decide without being influenced by past defaults.
-
Petitioner directed to file undertaking to be regular in compliance and deposit ₹5,000 with Gujarat State Legal Services Authority.
Between Fine Lines (Simple Summary)
-
GST registration was cancelled for repeated non-filing of returns.
-
Petitioner cleared all dues with interest and late fees.
-
Court recognized past defaults but gave relief considering compliance and undertaking.
-
SCN and cancellation order quashed.
-
Registration to be restored subject to fresh revocation application and compliance assurance.
Summary of Referred Cases
| Case Name | Citation | Summary | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aggrawal Dyeing and Printing Works vs. State of Gujarat | (2022) 137 Taxmann.com 332 (Guj.) | Court held that cancellation orders must not be cryptic; reasons are essential. | Relied upon by petitioner to argue cancellation order was non-speaking |
