Case Title: M/s. Prakash Kumar Kar v. Superintendent, CGST and Central Excise, Cuttack, Odisha
Court: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack
Petition No.: W.P.(C) No. 30577 of 2024
Date of Judgement: 10.12.2024
Category: Revocation of GST Registration / Delay Condonation
Relevant Provisions: Section 29 and Section 30 of the CGST Act, 2017; Rule 23 of the CGST/OGST Rules, 2017
Facts (Para 1 of Order)
The petitioner, M/s. Prakash Kumar Kar, challenged the cancellation of its GST registration by an order dated 12 December 2023, which followed a show cause notice issued on 8 August 2023. The petitioner, represented by Ms. I. Tripathy, Advocate, submitted that he was willing to pay all outstanding tax, interest, late fees, penalties, and any other dues necessary for acceptance of pending returns. He relied on the precedent set by the coordinate Bench in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack [W.P.(C) No. 30374 of 2022, Order dated 16 November 2022], where delay in invoking Rule 23 for revocation of cancelled registration was condoned by the High Court.
Questions for Consideration
Whether the High Court could condone the delay in applying for revocation of GST registration under Rule 23 of the OGST Rules and direct the Department to process the application if all dues were paid.
Observations (Paras 2–3 of Order)
The Court noted that the departmental counsel, Mr. A. Kedia, had also appeared in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises and therefore was aware of the precedent. The Bench referred to Paragraph 2 of the Mohanty Enterprises judgment, which held that delays in invoking the proviso to Rule 23 could be condoned in the interest of justice, provided the taxpayer deposits all dues, including tax, interest, late fee, and penalty, and complies with other procedural formalities.
Following the same reasoning, the Court found the petitioner’s case identical in circumstances and observed that granting relief would serve the interest of revenue as it enabled recovery of legitimate dues and restoration of tax compliance.
Judgement (Para 3–4 of Order)
The High Court allowed the writ petition, condoned the delay, and directed the department to consider the petitioner’s application for revocation of GST registration in accordance with law, subject to payment of all dues and completion of procedural requirements under Rule 23 of the OGST Rules. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
Table of Cases Referred
| Case Name | Citation / Petition No. | Held | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack & Ors. | W.P.(C) No. 30374 of 2022, Order dated 16.11.2022 | Delay in applying under Rule 23 condoned; revocation to be processed if dues are paid | Basis for granting similar relief in present case |
Between Fine Lines
This ruling reinforces a taxpayer-friendly approach where procedural delays in revocation of cancelled GST registrations can be condoned if the taxpayer shows bona fide intent to regularize compliance and clear all statutory dues. It underscores that condonation, while discretionary, aligns with the larger objective of maintaining revenue flow and supporting business continuity.
Disclaimer – “The above summary is for academic purpose only; not formal legal opinion. Seek professional opinion before application. Author or publisher or website shall not be responsible for any usage in any form.”
