HomeUpdatesITAT Refuses to Condon 2376-Day Delay Due to Gross Negligence | Shailesh... Updates ITAT Refuses to Condon 2376-Day Delay Due to Gross Negligence | Shailesh Narshibhai Patel v. ITO By Team Gstindiaguide 20th July 2026 0 2 Share FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsApp 🔒 Login to Read Full Content You are reading a preview. Log in to continue reading. Log In to Read New here? Register free RELATED ARTICLES Updates Scarlet Tradelink Pvt Ltd vs ITO – ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes Time-Barred Section 148 Notice | 7 July 2026 20th July 2026 Updates Parshwa Investment v. DCIT: ITAT Mumbai Quashes Reassessment Initiated Under Section 147 20th July 2026 Updates NIIT Ltd vs CIT (Central-II) – ITAT Delhi Quashes Section 263 Revision | 8 July 2026 20th July 2026 Leave a ReplyCancel reply Most Popular Scarlet Tradelink Pvt Ltd vs ITO – ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes Time-Barred Section 148 Notice | 7 July 2026 20th July 2026 Parshwa Investment v. DCIT: ITAT Mumbai Quashes Reassessment Initiated Under Section 147 20th July 2026 NIIT Ltd vs CIT (Central-II) – ITAT Delhi Quashes Section 263 Revision | 8 July 2026 20th July 2026 Madras High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond Limitation under Section 149 20th July 2026 Load more Recent Comments KALYANI ELECTRICALS on Penalty under GST quashed as High Court held that presentation of valid invoice rules out applicability of Section 129(1)(b) meant for non-owners Spardha Sharma on Circulars clarifying miscellaneous issues related to SEZ and refund of unutilized ITC for job workers.