Case Title: Beacon Tiles & Ors. vs. The Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Court: Calcutta High Court
Petition No.: WPA 21000 of 2024
Date of Judgement: 23 April 2025
Category of Dispute: Contractual Dues / Release of Security Deposit
Relevant Law: Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Facts of the Case
-
The petitioners sought disbursal of ₹15,44,914 (excluding GST & Labour Welfare Cess) arising from Work Order Memo No. 589/PWD (BMC) dated 24.09.2020, along with release of earnest money and security deposit of ₹37,046 (Para 2).
-
Petitioners claimed that they completed the assigned work within the stipulated period and made representations before Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation (BMC), but no payment was released (Para 3).
-
The Corporation contested liability, stating that no completion certificate was placed on record and the claim is factually disputed (Para 4–5).
Question(s) in Consideration
-
Whether the High Court under Article 226 can direct payment of contractual dues when the liability is not admitted, and no completion certificate has been produced? (Para 6–7).
Observation of Court
-
The Court found merit in BMC’s contention that the petitioners failed to produce documentary proof, including a completion certificate, to establish completion of work or admission of liability (Para 6).
-
In absence of foundational documentation and considering disputed questions of fact, the Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be invoked (Para 7).
Judgement of the Court
-
The writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable under Article 226 due to disputed facts (Para 7).
-
Petitioners were granted liberty to pursue remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law (Para 8).
-
Allegations in the petition were not deemed admitted since no affidavits were filed by respondents (Para 10).
-
No order as to costs (Para 11).
Between Fine Lines (5-Line Simplified Summary)
-
Petitioners claimed unpaid dues for work executed for BMC.
-
They sought release of both payment and security deposit.
-
BMC denied liability, citing absence of a completion certificate.
-
Court held that writ under Article 226 cannot decide disputed contractual claims.
-
Petitioners may seek relief before appropriate civil/contractual forum.
Summary of Referred Cases
No external precedents were cited or referred in this judgement.
Disclaimer – “The above summary is for academic purpose only; not formal legal opinion. Seek professional opinion before application. Author or publisher or website shall not be responsible for any usage in any form.”
