Facebook
Instagram
Linkedin
X
Youtube
Home
About
Case Laws
AAAR
AAR
High Court
Others
Supreme Court
Tribunal
Resources
Act
Circular
GST council minutes
Latest Downloads
Notification
Other government publication
Press relases
Rules
How do I?
FAQ’s
Expert Panel
Commentary
NEWS
My Account
Search
Facebook
Instagram
X
Vimeo
Home
Tags
Jharkhand High Court
Tag: Jharkhand High Court
Case Laws
Anticipatory bail granted to tax practitioner as Court held his role limited to GST registration without proof of involvement in fraudulent ITC claim
Kirti Gupta
-
27th September 2025
0
Case Laws
GST demand quashed as rejection of reply without addressing objections on GSTR-3B vs e-way bill mismatch held unsustainable
Kirti Gupta
-
27th September 2025
0
Case Laws
Refund of pre-deposit allowed as time bar under Section 54 held directory, not mandatory, ensuring Article 265 compliance
Kirti Gupta
-
27th September 2025
0
Case Laws
Transitional credit denial under Section 140 JGST Act quashed as Court held adjudication of pre-GST ITC eligibility must be under repealed laws, not under Section 73 CGST Act
Kirti Gupta
-
27th September 2025
0
Case Laws
Anticipatory bail denied as custodial interrogation deemed necessary in GST-linked forgery and misappropriation case
Kirti Gupta
-
27th September 2025
0
Case Laws
Blacklisting upheld as repeated delay in supplies justified government action despite plea of procedural irregularities
Kirti Gupta
-
27th September 2025
0
Case Laws
Adjudication orders quashed as ex-parte proceedings under GST were held without opportunity of hearing in violation of Sections 75(4) & 75(5)
Kirti Gupta
-
27th September 2025
0
Case Laws
Refund rejection quashed as extraneous conditions imposed by authorities were held contrary to GST Act, Rules, and binding circulars
Kirti Gupta
-
27th September 2025
0
Case Laws
GST reimbursement directed as withholding of GST impact on pre-GST contracts was held arbitrary, violating fairness and equality principles
Kirti Gupta
-
27th September 2025
0
Case Laws
GST demand quashed as unsigned notices and orders were held invalid for not being digitally signed under Rule 26(3)
Kirti Gupta
-
27th September 2025
0
1
2
Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...
Write a Comment...
Email (Required)
Name (Required)
Website