Case Title: Arunas Snack Product vs. State of Assam & Others
Court: Gauhati High Court
Petition Number: WP(C)/2851/2024
Date of Judgement: 27.01.2025
Category of Dispute: Input Tax Credit
Relevant Section: Section 16(5) of CGST Act, 2017 (as amended by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024)
Bench: Hon’ble Chief Justice Mr. Vijay Bishnoi, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami
📝 Facts of the Case
[Para 1-2]:
-
The petitioner, Arunas Snack Product, claimed ITC based on invoices for the FY 2018-19.
-
The input tax credit was denied earlier due to time bar under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act.
-
However, the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 introduced sub-section (5) in Section 16, which allows such ITC if the return was filed before 30.11.2021.
-
The petitioner had indeed filed such return before the cutoff date.
❓ Question(s) in Consideration
[Para 3]:
-
Whether the petitioner is entitled to avail ITC for FY 2018-19 in light of the newly inserted Section 16(5) of the CGST Act?
-
Whether any coercive action can be taken under the previously passed order dated 01.01.2024?
👩⚖️ Observations of the Court
[Para 4-5]:
-
The Court took note of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 which inserted sub-section (5) in Section 16 of the CGST Act.
-
As per the amended provision, ITC for FYs 2017-18 to 2020-21 can be claimed if the return was filed by 30.11.2021.
-
The petitioner’s return for FY 2018-19 was filed within this window.
-
Hence, their case falls squarely within the amended statutory provision.
🏛️ Judgement of the Court
[Para 6-7]:
-
The respondent authorities were directed to reconsider the petitioner’s case under the amended Section 16(5).
-
It was clarified that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in furtherance of the earlier order dated 01.01.2024.
-
The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.
✅ Between Fine Lines (Simple Summary in 5 Lines)
-
Petitioner claimed ITC for FY 2018-19 but was initially denied due to time bar.
-
A new provision in the CGST Act (Section 16(5)) now allows such claims filed before 30.11.2021.
-
The petitioner met this condition.
-
Court directed authorities to reconsider ITC eligibility as per the new law.
-
No coercive recovery can be made based on the earlier order.
📚 Summary of Referred Cases
| Name of Case | Citation | Summary | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| No cases specifically referred in the judgment | — | — | — |
Disclaimer – “The above summary is for academic purpose only; not formal legal opinion. Seek professional opinion before application. Author or publisher or website shall not be responsible for any usage in any form.”

