Case Title: M/s. Sita Nath Jena, Bhubaneswar vs. Additional State Tax Officer, CT & GST, Bhubaneswar
Court: Orissa High Court, Cuttack
Petition No.: W.P.(C) No. 29239 of 2024
Category: Revocation of GST Registration / Delay Condonation
Date of Judgement: 09 December 2024
Relevant Sections: Section 29 and Section 30 of the CGST Act, 2017; Rule 23 of the CGST/OGST Rules, 2017
Facts (Para 1 of Order)
The petitioner, M/s. Sita Nath Jena, challenged the show cause notice dated 24 November 2022 and the consequent order dated 30 December 2022 cancelling its GST registration under the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner, represented by Advocate Miss I. Tripathy, expressed readiness to pay all outstanding liabilities — including tax, interest, late fee, and penalty — to enable acceptance of pending returns.
Questions / Dispute
Whether the delay in filing an application for revocation of cancelled registration under Rule 23 of the CGST/OGST Rules could be condoned when the taxpayer is willing to clear all dues and comply with necessary procedural requirements.
Observations (Paras 1–3)
The Court observed that a coordinate Bench in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack (W.P.(C) No. 30374 of 2022, order dated 16 November 2022) had faced a similar issue. In that case, the delay in invoking the proviso to Rule 23 was condoned on the condition that all tax dues and penalties be paid, and the application for revocation be processed per law.
Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice M.S. Sahoo noted that the present petitioner’s claim for relief was fully covered by the same principle.
Judgement (Paras 3–4)
The High Court, relying on M/s. Mohanty Enterprises (supra), condoned the delay in seeking revocation under Rule 23 of the OGST Rules. The Court directed that upon the petitioner depositing all due taxes, interest, late fees, and penalties, and complying with other formalities, the department shall consider the application for revocation in accordance with law.
The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, extending relief in the interest of revenue.
Summary of Referred Case
| Case Name | Court | Issue | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack (W.P.(C) No. 30374 of 2022) | Orissa High Court | Delay in applying for revocation under Rule 23 | Delay condoned; revocation to be allowed upon payment of dues and compliance with formalities. |
Between Fine Lines
This ruling reinforces that GST registration cancellations can be rectified if the taxpayer shows bona fide intent to comply. The High Court continues its liberal stance — allowing delay condonation for revocation applications — provided the taxpayer clears all dues and follows the prescribed procedure. Businesses facing registration cancellation should promptly utilize this precedent to restore their registration in the interest of revenue compliance.
Disclaimer – “The above summary is for academic purpose only; not formal legal opinion. Seek professional opinion before application. Author or publisher or website shall not be responsible for any usage in any form.”