Home Tags Procedural Compliance

Tag: Procedural Compliance

Unsigned GST Orders Deemed Invalid by Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case Laws

Unsigned GST Orders Deemed Invalid by Andhra Pradesh High Court

Kirti Gupta -
0
Order Passed Beyond 7-Day Limit Under Section 129(3) Quashed by Orissa High Court
Case Laws

Order Passed Beyond 7-Day Limit Under Section 129(3) Quashed by Orissa High Court

Kirti Gupta -
0
Seized goods were released on furnishing a bond of and payment of Rs. 2 lakhs.
Case Laws

Seized goods were released on furnishing a bond of and payment of Rs. 2 lakhs.

Team Gstindiaguide -
0
Vehicle and Goods were detained alleging carrying expired e-way bill cannot be released by taking the benefit of multimodal shipment. The same was to be released on furnishing Bank Guarantee.
Case Laws

Vehicle and Goods were detained alleging carrying expired e-way bill cannot be released by taking the benefit of multimodal shipment. The same was to be released on furnishing Bank Guarantee.

Team Gstindiaguide -
0
Seizure and Confiscation of goods merely on the ground that there were no records maintained by Assessee was not valid.
Case Laws

Seizure and Confiscation of goods merely on the ground that there were no records maintained by Assessee was not valid.

Team Gstindiaguide -
0
Detention of vehicle on the ground that transport receipt was a photocopy and the details filled in the transport receipt were handwritten was not held justifiable.
Case Laws

Detention of vehicle on the ground that transport receipt was a photocopy and the details filled in the transport receipt were handwritten was not held justifiable.

Team Gstindiaguide -
0
Detention was justifiable if made on the ground of non-availability of Invoice Documents (Rule-138A of the CGST Rules, 2017)
Case Laws

Detention was justifiable if made on the ground of non-availability of Invoice Documents (Rule-138A of the CGST Rules, 2017)

Team Gstindiaguide -
0
Confiscation order passed on the ground of presumption that Assessee is involved in bogus billing without taking consideration of the actual movement and documents related to transaction was not justifiable.
Case Laws

Confiscation order passed on the ground of presumption that Assessee is involved in bogus billing without taking consideration of the actual movement and documents related to transaction was not justifiable.

Team Gstindiaguide -
0
Order issued under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 beyond the statutory period is not valid.
Case Laws

Order issued under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 beyond the statutory period is not valid.

Team Gstindiaguide -
0
Default bail under Section 167(2) of the Cr. PC would not be applicable to offences committed under Section 132 of the Goods and Services Tax Act,2017.
Case Laws

Default bail under Section 167(2) of the Cr. PC would not be applicable to offences committed under Section 132 of the Goods and Services Tax Act,2017.

Team Gstindiaguide -
0
123Page 2 of 3